The biggest obstacle for engineer productivity in 2026
AI code generation creates "dead zones" in your workflow. Master this protocol to stop context switching and maintain deep work while AI generates.
I think we all accept that AI tools like Copilot, Cursor, or ChatGPT make software engineers faster. The premise is simple: you type a prompt, the machine writes the boilerplate, and you ship features in a faster time.
However, this speed creates a paradoxical fragmentation in our workdays. While the code generation itself is fast, the human side of the equation is breaking down due to small waits.
Waiting for an IDE to generate code creates dozens of micro pauses throughout the day. These pauses are dangerous because they invite distractions like Slack, email, or social media. I have faced this challenge at work, where I check Slack while AI generates. Since using AI in your IDE, your days have become more fragmented, and that’s a risk for your productivity.
Being a productive engineer is about impact, not the volume of lines produced. It depends on sustained deep work and architectural thinking. It is about learning faster, being reliable in code reviews, and being able to be on-call to fix issues, thanks to developing a good intuition about your systems.
The biggest barrier for engineer productivity in 2026 is not the quality of the AI model. It is how you manage your attention during those few seconds that the IDE is thinking.
In this post, you’ll learn
Why the 5 to 30-second “dead zone” is the most dangerous risk for your focus.
The psychological reason your brain craves distraction during AI latency.
How context switching destroys your ability to audit code quality.
An actionable “AI Detox” protocol to maintain flow state while using LLMs.
The dead zone
We must define the specific time windows that affect our focus.
< 1 Second: Instant gratification. Keeps focus unbroken.
> 1+ Minute: Conscious break (coffee, stretch). Low cognitive cost.
5–15 Seconds (The Trap): It is too short to do real work or take a break, but long enough for the brain to crave a dopamine hit.
The psychology behind this is the static spinner (or Generating... text) in the IDE. This passive visual cue signals that there is nothing to do here. It gives your brain permission to disconnect. The brain treats this latency as a free pass to check communication channels.
I took some days off from work for Christmas, but I was still doing some coding on my personal laptop. I found I was tempted to switch tabs to Slack, like at work, only to find out I don’t have it installed on this laptop. This proved that the impulse is a behavioral habit rather than a necessity. And I decided to take action on it.
Many engineers fall for the false multitasking myth. They believe they can quickly check a message in 10 seconds. In reality, reading a message loads a completely new context. The return cost is high because switching back requires reloading the code context into working memory. This reloading process often takes longer than the original wait time. It’s like a plane: it takes a lot of energy and time to take off and land, but once it’s “in the zone”, it travels faster. Every time you switch contexts and switch back to the IDE, you have to “take off your task” again.
The hidden costs of context switching
I find the most interesting outcome of tab-switching is mental detachment. When you tab away, you mentally detach from the problem and place the responsibility of the code entirely on the AI. When you return, you are less likely to rigorously audit the AI-generated code. You accept that it looks like it works because re-engaging deep critical thinking feels too heavy after a distraction. More and more often, I find myself and others answering in PR comments: “Oh, that was my AI doing it”.
We must distinguish between types of context switching. Multitasking is switching to another context further from the primary one, like checking a Slack message on another project. Updating code in one file and the test in another is not really multitasking because you are still in the code context and the same project/task context. However, switching to Slack or email is a disaster; any context could come from out there. The cumulative effect of hundreds of these micro-switches leads to more decision fatigue. I don’t know about you, but since the use of AI, I’m feeling more mentally drained after work. More things are happening at the same time.
How do we handle similar problems?
Imagine you’re a senior engineer who just got assigned a junior engineer who has just finished the company onboarding and is ready to pick their first task. You need to give some work to this engineer. You can’t trust their output blindly, but you can’t take over and do it yourself.
What are you doing in those situations? Probably some of these:
Define the context very well upfront → Spend more time writing a better prompt or spec
Limit scope to reduce their cognitive load → Break down into small prompts with a single responsibility, chaining them after the previous one is completed
Implement frequent check-ins → Don’t wait 2 hours until code is deployed, only to find out it’s wrong. Ask AI to provide an implementation plan and review it, and ask AI to ask any questions that aren’t clear
Use static analysis/linters to reduce nitpick feedback → Use static analysis/linters to reduce the things you have to add to prompts/rules loaded
Spot patterns, not instances. This may trigger you to update onboarding or frame things in another way -> Spot the failure patterns of your AI to update the context rules or the way you put your prompts
With AI, we aren’t doing anything new. The difference is that it’s a machine, and everyone is hyped, so we treat it as new, unresolved problems. Look back in time to find how similar problems were resolved successfully. There’s a higher chance of success coming up with new things.
The “AI detox” protocol (actionable solutions)
The first step is the hands-off rule. When you hit “generate” in your IDE, physically remove your hands from the keyboard and decide consciously what you’ll do next. The goal is to break the muscle memory of hitting Cmd+Tab. You should only leave the “IDE context” if you leave things running in the background for an intentional break, like getting coffee. Otherwise, stay in the IDE.
Remove low-friction escapes to succeed. Close Slack so you cannot switch tabs into it. Rename it or put it under a different folder so you cannot access it fast, only intentionally. Block social sites on work machines so that distraction requires intent rather than reflex. We’ll replace this switch with active waiting.
Read the thought process of the LLM or plan your next prompts.
Queue the next prompts in your IDE while the current one runs.
Review the code changes from the LLM as they are generated
Review the previous code output while the next one is getting generated (chaining prompts)
We can apply the Atomic Habits framework to this problem:
Cue: The trigger that initiates a behavior. It predicts a reward.
Example: A phone notification
Craving: This is the motivational force behind the habit. You don’t crave the habit itself, but the reward it brings.
Example: Curiosity/social connection to know who messaged you and what they said.
Response: This is the actual action.
Example: You pick up the phone and read the text.
Reward: The end goal of every habit. It satisfies the craving and teaches your brain to remember this action for the future.
Example: You satisfy your curiosity and feel connected to the sender.
Going back to our IDE:
The cue is the wait time after prompt submission, the “Generating...” message.
The craving is to do something in the middle to keep your brain active.
We’ll change the response from checking Slack to reading the chain of thought of the AI model.
The reward is that your mind has something to do while the IDE is generating, and you do not switch contexts.
Besides changing the response to something better, we can also remove the cue. It’s better to reframe it, or you’d fall again into the old habit, and I wouldn’t go back into coding without AI. But we can reduce the amount of wait time by optimizing our AI model stack:
Slow thinking models to generate an implementation plan or brainstorm the feature. Claude Opus Models, Gemini 3 Pro / GPT 5.2 with “high” reasoning, etc
Fast models to execute. Gemini 3 flash is a beast, as it has almost the same intelligence as bigger models, but it is much faster. Composer by Cursor is also fast and does the job.
Intentional context switches
There are specific scenarios where switching is acceptable, provided it follows a long switch. If the prompt involves a massive refactor or a multi-step iteration taking 15 minutes or more, you shouldn’t sit idle or watch AI work on something trivial but long.
Let’s say I have queued a few prompts to:
Implement a feature
Updating broken unit tests
Implementing new unit tests for the new functionality
Iterating on the build until it succeeds, and all tests pass, and we have good coverage
Deploying
There isn’t much for me to do there. I’d pick another small task. But make sure you are intentional about what you will do, such as reviewing a PR from someone else. Don’t get distracted just by checking Slack.
I like thinking about my brain as a CPU handling concurrency. I don’t have multiple cores (no parallelism), but I can switch from one thing to another, leaving the other paused. However, each switch has a huge cost. The CPU allocation strategy would be to minimize switches, but at the same time, to avoid becoming idle for 10 minutes while AI generates.
For example, let’s say your primary focus is a meeting you have (your brain-CPU picks it up). You can dedicate a minimal switch to run builds, test suites, or trivial AI prompts, leaving it running in the background, and pick it up after the meeting. You must make sure you are not constantly switching during the meeting. Prepare a chain of prompts or a chain of terminal commands to make sure they work in the background without your attention. Your primary focus is the meeting, but you can leave something easy running in the background.
I always tried to have a build or a deployment running during my lunch break. Now I also do it with AI prompts.
Pro tip: In macOS, you can prevent your laptop from going to sleep when you lock the screen, so your IDE keeps working by changing System Settings > Energy > Stop automatic sleeping when the display is off
Conclusion
AI is a tool for speed, but only if you control the friction between prompts.
The engineers who grow the fastest are not just the ones who prompt the best. They are the ones who can maintain the deepest focus for the longest period. This is the only way to solve complex problems.
I challenge you to try changing what you do while AI generates, and see how your code understanding and energy levels improve.
This is an article inside our system to move from phase 2 to phase 3: Generate career capital. You can only do so by working deeply and solving problems that matter, not by distracting your mind with Slack or social media
I’m building this system for paid subscribers. Thanks for your continued support!
🗞️ Other articles people like
👏 Weekly applause
Here are some articles I liked this past week:
Consistent Hashing in a Nutshell by Saurabh Dashora . Consistent hashing keeps keys evenly distributed in a distributed system with uneven data.
If I Were a Student Again by Daniil Shykhov . This is a mindset that I really like. Instead of having only one path, there are many side quests that teach you new things and keep you engaged. This newsletter is one of those 😄
80% Of The Times, Scaling Is Not a Rewrite Problem by Raul Junco . Resist the urge to rewrite. Most scaling issues are solved by better observability and applying small changes.
Turn Chaotic Reviews Into Clear Decisions by Sidwyn Koh . Stop wasting time in circular meetings. Shift to a “Write First, Meet Second” culture. This exists in Amazon culture, and it’s something I really like. It’s the way communication scales.
P.S. This may interest you:
Are you in doubt whether the paid version of the newsletter is for you? Discover the benefits here
Could you take one minute to answer a quick, anonymous survey to make me improve this newsletter? Take the survey here
Are you a brand looking to advertise to engaged engineers and leaders? Book your slot now
Give a like ❤️ to this post if you found it useful, and share it with a friend to get referral rewards
The fancy images are likely AI-generated, the not-so-fancy ones by me :)